dontworry
08-08 12:36 PM
Saw an approval case in . It was transferred to TSC but receipt # starts with WAC***
http://www..com/member/chakrsa/
http://www..com/member/chakrsa/
wallpaper Top women#39;s hairstyle for 2010
Swati Solanki
10-04 04:08 PM
Mine was received on 18th july too by R Cook. No news yet! Did anyone's cheque got cashed out?
skd
06-17 10:57 PM
I am also in same situation...
2011 Hair Styles 2010 For Women
CHHAYA
04-26 01:01 PM
I am working on EAD and want to work 20 hrs. What is the risk involved in I-485 processing? Thanks in advance for any light.
more...
carbon
11-01 04:35 PM
any experts. please help.
pvpb
10-18 11:29 AM
My case was filed at NSC on august 3rd...transferred to VSC and the 485 was transferred to TSC evn though my 140 is fro NSC...donno the logic behind it though
Hi
I m starting a new thread for people whose 485 packets sent to VSC for receipting and returned back to TSC for 485 adjudication
EB3
PD 10/04
RD 08/03
ND 10/12
I-140 filed @ TSC, I-485 sent to TSC. Checks cashed from VSC and I-485 returned back to TSC
I-765, I-131, FP are pending.
Hi
I m starting a new thread for people whose 485 packets sent to VSC for receipting and returned back to TSC for 485 adjudication
EB3
PD 10/04
RD 08/03
ND 10/12
I-140 filed @ TSC, I-485 sent to TSC. Checks cashed from VSC and I-485 returned back to TSC
I-765, I-131, FP are pending.
more...
Steve Mitchell
June 20th, 2004, 10:26 AM
I think the point of focus in the shot of the guy in the boxing stance needs to be his face. Plus, his knuckles seem slightly blown out. In the shot of the guy kneeling, again the focal point seems a bit misplaced. It looks like it is on the inside of his left thigh, and I think I would want it to be his face. shollow DOF portraits can be really tricky.
I need to hand in three photos for my final this week.
These are them. Let me have it. :)
I need to hand in three photos for my final this week.
These are them. Let me have it. :)
2010 Short Pixie Hairstyles 2010
same_old_guy
10-27 01:49 PM
The Director of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), Emilio Gonzalez, stated in an interview with the New York Times that he is recommending a significant increase in USCIS fees to cover the cost of processing applications. While the article specifically mentions naturalization applications, it does not clearly limit the recommended increase only to this application. It is possible, therefore, that many applications and petitions processed by the USCIS could be affected by his recommendation.
http://www.murthy.com/news/n_feepos.html
http://www.murthy.com/news/n_feepos.html
more...
kumarc123
08-26 10:11 AM
Hi All,
I am here in US on a H1B and my wife is on a H4. She recently got admission to a graduate school and has to start next week. I am worried that if I get her COS for the next semester (this is a 1 year program), then woud she be eligible to get her OPT at the end of the program? She would have been on a F1 for less than a year, but would have completed the Master's program.
I tried to get more information, but what I saw was that the OPT eligiblility requirement is atleast 1 full academic year on F1. Is this correct?
Help is greatly appreciated.
I am in the similar boat, don't worry your wife can always take etc classes as electives, and complete her one year. You can always pick etc classes, and make sure you remain in legal F1 visa status.
I am here in US on a H1B and my wife is on a H4. She recently got admission to a graduate school and has to start next week. I am worried that if I get her COS for the next semester (this is a 1 year program), then woud she be eligible to get her OPT at the end of the program? She would have been on a F1 for less than a year, but would have completed the Master's program.
I tried to get more information, but what I saw was that the OPT eligiblility requirement is atleast 1 full academic year on F1. Is this correct?
Help is greatly appreciated.
I am in the similar boat, don't worry your wife can always take etc classes as electives, and complete her one year. You can always pick etc classes, and make sure you remain in legal F1 visa status.
hair Short Hair Styles for 2010
bayarea07
04-08 04:04 PM
Hello All,
I have a quick question regarding my EAD.
I got my EAD through Company A and then that company got bought Over by Company B, though in my Employer name Section, my EAD is still held by Company A.
Question 1 - So Next Time,if i file for my EAD extension,do i need to file any kind of amednment to speciy the new company B in EAD and all USCIS document
Question 2 - What if Company B decided to close down its newly acquired unilt which is Company A, what happens of my EAD status, will that be invalid now.
Please respond.
Thanks!
I have a quick question regarding my EAD.
I got my EAD through Company A and then that company got bought Over by Company B, though in my Employer name Section, my EAD is still held by Company A.
Question 1 - So Next Time,if i file for my EAD extension,do i need to file any kind of amednment to speciy the new company B in EAD and all USCIS document
Question 2 - What if Company B decided to close down its newly acquired unilt which is Company A, what happens of my EAD status, will that be invalid now.
Please respond.
Thanks!
more...
sw33t
07-30 12:07 PM
23 members and counting.
Have you signed up yet?
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/texasiv
Have you signed up yet?
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/texasiv
hot Hairstyles 2010 for Women
harshailan
07-31 05:34 PM
All the cases filed in feb 2007 and sent to nebraska are still pending including mine. Some cases filed in feb in texas center have been processed.
Don't worry you need to wait atleast few more months for them to start looking at your application.
check the processing times here
https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/ptimes.jsp
Don't worry you need to wait atleast few more months for them to start looking at your application.
check the processing times here
https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/ptimes.jsp
more...
house new-fall-haircuts-trends-2010-
eucalyptus.mp
04-30 04:04 PM
HI ,
MY H1 b is expiring on 30 Sep ,2009 .
My current client informed me that they are going to hire me as a fulltime , but it will take 2-3 months for them to hire me .
Should I ask my current employer to file H1 extention right now ?
Or I should wait for H1 trnsfer as a fulltime employee ?
Any suggestions ?
Thanks
MY H1 b is expiring on 30 Sep ,2009 .
My current client informed me that they are going to hire me as a fulltime , but it will take 2-3 months for them to hire me .
Should I ask my current employer to file H1 extention right now ?
Or I should wait for H1 trnsfer as a fulltime employee ?
Any suggestions ?
Thanks
tattoo Celebrity Hairstyles 2010
kaisersose
08-08 09:44 AM
My company is paying all cost of GC. So they refused to file after July 2nd USCIS letter.
But the July 2nd decision was reversed later. Why did they not file then?
Besides, companies do not need to pay for 485. Makes no sense for them to pay for something that they do not have to.
On a separate note, does anyone know of any company which has discontinued GC processing because the new rule states the employer has to pay for PERM?
But the July 2nd decision was reversed later. Why did they not file then?
Besides, companies do not need to pay for 485. Makes no sense for them to pay for something that they do not have to.
On a separate note, does anyone know of any company which has discontinued GC processing because the new rule states the employer has to pay for PERM?
more...
pictures Women Long Beautiful Hairstyle
bkshres
10-27 04:26 PM
I paid $350 to my attorney. However there is no filing fee.
dresses Fresh Hair Styles | 2010
Munna Bhai
01-25 09:51 AM
Even GC cannot work on security Clearance projects. Only Citizens allowed.
That is true, but depends on degree of security clearance, if it is less than GC can work.
But what is the way out for H1bs??
That is true, but depends on degree of security clearance, if it is less than GC can work.
But what is the way out for H1bs??
more...
makeup Curly hairstyle should always
starscream
09-10 09:40 PM
Friends please see situation below:
My PERM labor mentions 24 months of experience required for my current position. PERM has been approved and I-140 is pending.
I got experience letters from 2 of my previous employers as proof of experience:
Letter from Company A on company letterhead signed by the Director stating I worked there from Feb, 2004 to oct 2005.(18 months)
Letter from Company B on company letterhead signed by my former manager stating I worked there for approx 17 and a half months.
Both these letters together cover all the skills mentioned in PERM 9089 form that are required for my current position as well as the experience of 24 months and the content of both letters has been okayed by my employer's lawyers.
There is one issue tough: On PERM labor form 9089 in Section K (alien work experience) for my company A job, start date has been mentioned as 12/01/2003, whereas the Company A letter mentions it as february 2004. This is because from 12/01/2003 to the beginning of February 2004 I was being trained and started my client engagement in February 2004. Hence company A mentioned February 2004 as the start date. For Company B the start/end dates on the letter and fPERM labor form 9089 match exactly.
Would the 2 months difference in start date for Company A cause a issue with the I-140 like geting RFE - even tough skills and duration of work experience that were mentioned in the labor are supported by the 2 letters???
Thanks
My PERM labor mentions 24 months of experience required for my current position. PERM has been approved and I-140 is pending.
I got experience letters from 2 of my previous employers as proof of experience:
Letter from Company A on company letterhead signed by the Director stating I worked there from Feb, 2004 to oct 2005.(18 months)
Letter from Company B on company letterhead signed by my former manager stating I worked there for approx 17 and a half months.
Both these letters together cover all the skills mentioned in PERM 9089 form that are required for my current position as well as the experience of 24 months and the content of both letters has been okayed by my employer's lawyers.
There is one issue tough: On PERM labor form 9089 in Section K (alien work experience) for my company A job, start date has been mentioned as 12/01/2003, whereas the Company A letter mentions it as february 2004. This is because from 12/01/2003 to the beginning of February 2004 I was being trained and started my client engagement in February 2004. Hence company A mentioned February 2004 as the start date. For Company B the start/end dates on the letter and fPERM labor form 9089 match exactly.
Would the 2 months difference in start date for Company A cause a issue with the I-140 like geting RFE - even tough skills and duration of work experience that were mentioned in the labor are supported by the 2 letters???
Thanks
girlfriend 2010 mohawk hairstyle for
Becks
03-16 07:23 PM
Wait till you get your new H1 if possible and enter with new visa stamped on your passport. That is the cleanest way. You can also enter with previous H1 visa(with previous employer) and show the new I797. But i recommend you to go for cleanest approach.
hairstyles Medium Hairstyles for Women
shreekarthik
07-01 07:25 PM
I had expected some kind of outlook from the recent AILA - DoS liaison that happened in San Antonio. Both Matthew Oh and Sheela Murthy did not report any outlook. But here's an outlook from another lawyer
http://www.gtlaw.com/practices/immi.../2006/06/27.htm
Immigration News Flash
June 27, 2006
Further Retrogression for Employment-Based Immigrant Visas Anticipated
At a recent immigration conference in San Antonio, it was reported that the Department of State ("DOS") expects that the EB1 China category will remain current and the EB2 China category to continue advancing. On a less positive note, further delays in the EB1 and EB2 categories for Indian nationals is expected as well as the EB3 category for all nationalities. With the Department of Labor's optimistic projection that the the Backlog Elimination Centers will meet their goal of eliminating its backlog and processing the remaining labor certifications filed pre-PERM implementation by September 2007, the DOS expects severe retrogression in many of the categories, particularly the EB3 categories - across the board. While this report is pure speculation, it does spark concern that applicants will be facing further delays in the permanent residence process. The DOS' Visa Bulletin is released on a monthly basis at http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/b...letin_1770.html. Greenberg Traurig will continue to monitor this issue and provide further updates as soon as they are available.
Looks like it's a long haul for EB3 in general and could be punishing for EB3-IND and EB2-IND.
This is the effect of increasing the H1B quota to 115,000 for 2 years and then to 195000 in 1 year without actually increasing the GC quota.
Good luck to all of us. Those who are in late 2001 and early 2002 EB3-IND filers can hope to get relief in the next year or so but unless some bill passes other EB3-IND filers should possibly work towards Plan B. Also read the report by USCIS ombudsman. It's quite revealing about the working of USCIS. This country might be technologically advanced but it's bureaucracy seems to be much worse than third world countries comparitively.
http://www.gtlaw.com/practices/immi.../2006/06/27.htm
Immigration News Flash
June 27, 2006
Further Retrogression for Employment-Based Immigrant Visas Anticipated
At a recent immigration conference in San Antonio, it was reported that the Department of State ("DOS") expects that the EB1 China category will remain current and the EB2 China category to continue advancing. On a less positive note, further delays in the EB1 and EB2 categories for Indian nationals is expected as well as the EB3 category for all nationalities. With the Department of Labor's optimistic projection that the the Backlog Elimination Centers will meet their goal of eliminating its backlog and processing the remaining labor certifications filed pre-PERM implementation by September 2007, the DOS expects severe retrogression in many of the categories, particularly the EB3 categories - across the board. While this report is pure speculation, it does spark concern that applicants will be facing further delays in the permanent residence process. The DOS' Visa Bulletin is released on a monthly basis at http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/b...letin_1770.html. Greenberg Traurig will continue to monitor this issue and provide further updates as soon as they are available.
Looks like it's a long haul for EB3 in general and could be punishing for EB3-IND and EB2-IND.
This is the effect of increasing the H1B quota to 115,000 for 2 years and then to 195000 in 1 year without actually increasing the GC quota.
Good luck to all of us. Those who are in late 2001 and early 2002 EB3-IND filers can hope to get relief in the next year or so but unless some bill passes other EB3-IND filers should possibly work towards Plan B. Also read the report by USCIS ombudsman. It's quite revealing about the working of USCIS. This country might be technologically advanced but it's bureaucracy seems to be much worse than third world countries comparitively.
pappu
04-21 04:30 PM
Could you send the contribution details to IV. You can either PM or send an email.
desanar
04-05 08:49 AM
Please share as much information as you can so it will also help views of this forum.
Is your friend working? 26 states requires SSN, if your friend is working on SSN required state, how she/he got it? Most of the RN position just required 2 year education how does the individual able to file H1B. Please try to answer as many question as you can. Thanks.
Is your friend working? 26 states requires SSN, if your friend is working on SSN required state, how she/he got it? Most of the RN position just required 2 year education how does the individual able to file H1B. Please try to answer as many question as you can. Thanks.